Wednesday, 5 April 2017

A simple way of Calculating a Tuned Pipe Length



I managed to acquire a brand new in box OS61VR.

There is very little information on this engine on the OS archive, in fact I cant find any reference to it. I have a choice of a number of tuned pipes I can use  - one came with it, but it looked rather small compared with the other 60 sized pipes I have so it may be the wrong pipe. The supplied header also appears to have been used as a hammer - it was very badly creased so I ordered a new one from Just Engines.

They also had no information on this engine.



It  has a large inlet and exhaust port. This suggests that the engine will be rather powerful and probably very thirsty as well.



Now, forgive me if I am teaching you to suck eggs here, but I need to set the pipe length and this can be calculated using the following formula.

Pipe length (in inches) = Exhaust Timing (in degrees) * 1650 / Desired RPM.

I am hoping to get 12000 rpm on a 12x8 prop (in the absence of any other information).

The exhaust timing is calculated by placing the engine at TDC, turn the crank (in the direction of rotation) and look for the piston crown just appearing through the exhaust port (at the top). Note the angle on the timing disc. Continue to rotate through BDC until the piston crown disappears again on the compression stroke - i.e. you have timed the exhaust open window.

I made up a simple timing disk and attached a pointer using a jubilee clip as shown.


and




Using this technique, I measured this engine to have an exhaust open timing of 145 degrees.


Substituting the numbers above,

Pipe length = 145 * 1650 /12000 = 19.9375". The pipe length is measured from the centre of the piston crown to the baffle in the pipe where the diverging and converging cones meet.

There becomes a point where the exhaust timing becomes too long for a tuned pipe to become effective. A longer exhaust open time will give the user an easier handling engine but the benefits of the tuned pipe diminish - reducing to zero when the timing increases towards about 175 degrees.



Monday, 3 April 2017

Downloads

This is a short post  that links the downloads that I have made available.


Mystic 40




Mystic 40 plan and and cut parts layout



Kwik Fli 3 for a 40



Kwik Fli 3-40 plans and cut parts layout 

Kwik Fli 4 for a 40



Glass Slipper Slope Soarer



DH87B for Indoor Scale

I have been asked to take part in the indoor Scale Nationals at the end of March 2017. Probably being rather overambitious but I have taken up the challenge and will try and build a 1/14 scale DH 87B Hornet Moth.

G-AELO is the target aircraft that I am going to try and replicate,

(image Wikipedia)

I started work on the plans in 2015 - it was originally intended as a Free Flight Scale model at 1/12 scale (31" span) - something I may attempt to start and complete again in the future.

I have simply scaled down the original CAD drawing I produced and I am using this as the primary source for the airframe structural layout. As the CAD drawing is currently incomplete, it is likely that I will have to rework substantial parts of the model. Hopefully not too much rework though.

G-AELO is also one of the featured aircraft in the book "De Havilland Moths in Detail" by Stuart McKay.



This will simplify getting the supporting documentation needed for the competition. By the way, the book is an excellent read, a great deal of information provided in a manner that is very interesting with some superb photography to support the text.  Makes you feel part of the story. Highly recommended.

This is the plan that I am currently working to. It's traditional Stick and Tissue construction but with micro RC gear fitted. The Scale Maestro Danny Fenton is also giving me lots of guidance and for that I am exceedingly grateful.



The plan was tile printed from PDF and the A4 sheets taped up then trimmed. A very low cost way of producing a plan




There is not much actual build information on the plan, its really just a parts placement plan so ideas will be tried (and many rejected) as the model is being built. I'll also be trying out some new ideas as well


A couple of evenings in the shed and one side is almost completed. The cling film is to protect the airframe - not the plan.

The second side is built directly on top of this side (separated by cling film) and then joined together using cross members with measurements taken directly from the plan. That curved top elevation will be fun to achieve.


The fuselage sideas are jigged upright and then a few selected spacers added. The whole lot is then weighed down carefully and the glue allowed to dry thoroughly. The taper behind the wing is straight and very simple to achieve. The taper in front of the wing is curved and different top and bottom and far more challenging.


Very fragile in this state, I cant imagine how many spacers I have to secure. Glue is weight and is kept to a minimum, sometimes a little more is required.

The front fuselage spacers added and work started on the fin.

I used a laser dye transfer method. I am trying to get the appearance of a scale structure. The method is quite simple, laser print the shape with ribs etc. Flip the print face down on the balsa with the grain running in the correct direction and then rub a little cellulose thinners through and the image is magically transferred onto the wood.


This has a 1/32 balsa core hollowed out around the 1/32 doublers in the fin area then a significant amount of wood is removed from the rudder, leaving mainly an outline and the 1/32 square ribs. The whole lot is then sanded down to a streamline.

It sits in the top of the fuselage with the small tongue located in a slot in a 1/32 fill sheet. Weight of the fin and rudder is 1.44gms


The nose block was manufactured from 1/2" very light sheet balsa. A suitable sized washer - the same diameter as the spinner was tacked into place and gave me something to sand to.


Its not quite the correct shape yet, but its not a million miles out either


And this is what it looks like. The 3 curved upper front deck formers are slightly too high and need to be reduced by a couple of mm.

The cockpit was fabricated and installed before the fuselage could be covered.


I was really quite pleased with that console as a first attempt


Cant claim any credit for the pilot. He is actually slightly too small in scale and I did have to provide legs and paint him (now known as Cedric).

And installed..

Wing construction is fairly traditional for indoor models, comprising of wing ribs created by wrapping a preformed (sliced strip) for the top and bottom over internal spars. I a not entirely happy with this method of construction. While it is undoubtedly very light (the wing panels weighed 8 grams each), I found it rather too fragile for my ham fistedness.

Ailerons were built with the wing then separated when ready for covering then hinging


A sort of bare bones shot.


The flight radio gear was procured from Micron UK, comprising of a micro Rx and servos and a park-fly motor, gearbox and prop.


Carbon push-rods used for the aileron linkages out to traditional bell-cranks. Horns fabricated from 1/32 plywood.

I found covering very difficult. Any construction errors were magnified by the resulting creases and it took many attempts to get it to a state that I was half happy with.


 The model was covered in red and silver Esaki Jap tissue. The orange roof panels were from Orange cellophane from a brand of Jaffa Cakes.


Windows frames cut from a very thin baking tray and glazing from the base of a cake tray.



Tailplane and rudder


Interplane struts are located using a bent pin through a small loop in the correct place


Lettering and logos were produced in Photoshop then transferred back into CAD to make sure that the size was correct then printed onto transfer paper then finally sprayed with car lacquer to make them waterproof, before they ere placed in water to separate them from the backing

When finally finished, it looked like this






A very interesting project. I am not entirely happy with the wings as they have bowed slightly and may redo them but I think its not a bad representation of the original.

Monday, 9 January 2017

DHC-1 Chipmunk - wing

After about a 18 month break, I have restarted work on the Chipmunk. The Fuselage has been parked for the time being and I have started work on the wings. Nothing too challenging at the moment, it is simply a case or reigniting my enthusiasm, getting a bit of progress and hopefully, I'll now see this through to completion.

As before, it will have to fit in with whatever else is happening in the Shed, but now I have got the irritating bits of the design out of my system (it's scale accuracy), I feel much happier and I'll now try and get this completed and with a moderate amount of scale detail. Like all large projects and eating elephants, its best to approach the task, one bite at a time.



The parts kit is almost complete (centre rib and 2 1/16 ply brace/doubler ribs not present - but that's not a problem) although the balsa wing rib wood is rather hard and prone to splitting. Still quite usable but I am not sure how it will survive a hard arrival.



Lots of clamps used to make sure the joints are nice and tight. The number of braces in the centre are in my opinion rather excessive but that is what we are stuck with. The wing certainly wont fold in flight. It was actually far more difficult to get the two panels to align correctly surprisingly. It took me 3 attempts to get it to where I am happy with it.


 Progress so far has been slow but the upper wing sheeting has been added. I can how start work on the aileron push-rods and the undercarriage. A bit of belt and braces while work progresses on the overly delicate Hornet Moth


I was never happy with the original method of retaining the torsion bar undercarriage legs which used tinplate straps binding the legs and then screwed to a hardwood block. The centre section is so over engineered - this looks like a potential weak point.

My approach has been to implement much larger beech blocks and cut a deep channel. Aluminium plate saddle clamps will hold the leg in place without risking damaging the wing skins  which sit below the torsion bar.




The anti twist stop will use a metal saddle clamp - bolted through the wing ribs




 Hobby King Oleo legs grafted onto the end of the torque rods. These are designed to be clamped. Its quite an easy task to drill out to 4mm to fit (interference) with the 8swg (4.1mm) diameter rod.

M3 hole drilled and tapped all the way through and cap head screws used to clamp the legs in place. A small flat will be ground on the legs to prevent them twisting


The sprint tension is too tight. The spring needs to be reduced in tension so that the leg compresses by about 6mm with (guessing) about 1.5kg load on them. I don't want to soften the spring, simply reduce the preload - the easiest approach is to incrementally reduce the spring length.

Sunday, 11 December 2016

Fairey Delta 2 - PSS (1)

I am being 'encouraged' to have a go at building a Powered Scale Soarer - a model based on a normally powered prototype, but primarily designed for flying as a Slope Soarer using lift generated by the upward movement of the air as it rises over a hill.

I didn't do a lot of research. It appeared that many of the PSS models were scale models of Jet Aircraft and I fancied a cold war era aircraft. I actually knew nothing about the Fairey Delta 2 - it just looked right - and I decided that would be the design I will model.

Gordon Whitehead kindly provided me with a short article detailing the history of the aircraft and I have reproduced it as a short PDF document that can be downloaded


Fairey Delta 2



I am designing at 1/6 scale. This gives a model with a modest wingspan of 1.36m but with a fuselage length of 2.62m - with a very pointy nose..


Fairey Delta 2 Dimensions

Specifications (Fairey Delta 2) - from Wikipedia

Length: 51 ft 7½ in (15.74 m)

Wingspan: 26 ft 10 in (8.18 m)
Height: 11 ft 0 in (3.35 m)
Wing area: 360 ft2 (33.44 m2)
Empty weight: 11,000 lb (4990 kg)
Gross weight: 13,884 lb (6298 kg)

1/6 scale


Wingspan 1.36m
Length 2.62m

Length/Span Ratio 1.92:1

Working with a hybrid of design tools, DevFus for the Fuselage and Profili for the wing and then consolidated with Draftsight 2017 - this is still Work in Progress.

Design is obviously simplified as there is  no engine and undercarriage..

Wing section is based upon the NACA M4, but with the camber reduced to give a semi symmetrical front part of the profile but still retaining the slight reflex.   

It should be OK for this model. Its quite thin at just over 6 percent thickness, but the root chord is  huge by my standards at 915mm!

The wing section will taper linearly and transform to a simple NACA0008 at the wing tip. With a tip chord of only 98mm, the thickness at the wing tip is only 8mm thick. Getting this built and maintaining strength to handle slope side landings will be tricky.

Output from DevFus looked like this:

considering 3mm ply formers, spruce longerons and covered in a mix of 3mm Depron and Balsa.

The wing outer panels will plug into the centre section with the wing split at an angle from the side of the dummy air intakes to the fuselage side. I envisage that wing construction will be carbon composite spars and joiner tubes, balsa sheeted leading edge and Depron sheeting behind the main spar. Something along those lines anyway.. :)

The plan is at this stage. The Depron Balsa mix has not been decided but the keel area will be planked in 3mm spruce to provide a little resilience for those rocky landings.


That is just about where I am up to.

More to come..

Wednesday, 30 November 2016

Kanga Fun Flyer

This is a Joey Fun Flyer derivative, the original was designed by Johan Smit. The Joey plan was downloaded from Aerofred and modified extensively for an electric conversion.

The purpose of this particular build was to give me a model for the Inter Club Fun Fly series of events which appear to be gaining in momentum - particularly in the NW of England where I live.

This is my derivative from the original plan, named Kanga, hopefully, it will bounce just as well.




The biggest change to the original design was to extend the fuselage to accommodate the lighter electric motor and LiPo. Mounting the elevator and rudder servos in the rear necessitated a further extension.

Following discussions with Andy Ellison, a few other tweaks were made to make it more rugged and help it survive the rough and tumble of a Fun Fly contest.

Tailplane and Fin
These were built almost exactly as per the original Joey but with 0.014" Carbon Fibre bracing doubler along the tailplane spar and the front of the fin post. Hinges are carbon fibre sheet which also add additional toughness.


The fin and rudder. Looking carefully, you can see the carbon fibre doubler on the front edge of the fin post


Tailplane construction starts with the pre-hinged spar and elevator joiner. 1.5 mm spruce doublers are inlaid into the joiner that links the two tailplane halved together



The almost completed tailplane. Hard points for the horns are yet to be added


Wing
The LE and front spars were laminated from 2 x 3 mm sq spruce, the main spar is 6 mm square balsa with a spruce doubler, top and bottom as shown on the original plan. The gap between the ailerons has been increased by 30 mm  and the wing is now retained by bands, rather than bolts as per the original.  A 2 mm carbon fibre rod brace has been embedded into the LE at the centre section (approx 30 mm each side of centre) to prevent dings from forming in the LE if the wing swivels around the fuselage former. Wing tips are 5 mm balsa with lightning holes. The main spar is extended to the tip along with the upper of the rear spars.


Wing ribs are cut using a ply template. Note the use of building tabs to prevent twists (warps) being built into the wing

Wing construction is quite simple. No plan is needed, simply mark a line for the Trailing Edge of the wing, then mark out the positions of each wing rib. Pin down the lower spar and then add the ribs, making sure they are upright and square. Add the TE, upper spars and leading edge. 


There are two ribs that are close together that  have the aileron servo tray sandwiched between them. Adjust the height so that the top of the servo turret is about 3 mm above the top of the rib. I mounted my servos on the top of the wing for protection, convention dictates that they are located under the wing.

The wing D box is sheeted with 1.5 mm balsa and with 1.5 x 8 mm cap strips behind the D box. The TE has a 1.5 mm x 8 mm false TE, top and bottom that sits over the real TE.


Wing tips are 5 mm light balsa with lightning holes. Note that I have also added lightning holes in the external wing ribs. Every gram counts. A short length of triangle stock to keep the tip square and the spars are extended to the top. At the very rear of the tip, there is a tapered strip of 1/16" ply to add a little extra local strength


 The ailerons are conventionally built. The TE of the Aileron is L shaped with the vertical part made from 3mm x 5mm spruce. Because of the method of construction, I have used conventional hinges for the ailerons, 4 per panel. To ensure that they are secure, 6mm soft balsa blocks have been added at the wing and aileron side to ensure a good glue contact area


Fuselage
Basically a simple box construction, 2.5 mm balsa sides, 1.5 mm balsa top and bottom. 1/16" ply doubler from the front former back to behind the aileron clearance cut out and 1/32" ply doubler around the tail. 3 mm longerons top and bottom between the ply doublers. The 1/16" ply doublers have 26 mm lightning holes cut in them down the full length

A 2.5 mm Lite ply deck sits from behind the front former to half way down the wing and is used to locate the ESC (top behind the motor), LiPo, underneath and Receiver - under the wing.

The former in front of the wing is 3 mm birch ply which interlocks with the deck and also the small 6 mm undercarriage mounting plate.

The engine mount former is also 3 mm birch ply. a third former located at the TE of the wing is made from 2.5 mm Lite ply.

The unusual part of the fuselage is the cut away behind the main part of the wing. This allow the wing to skew without impact the ailerons or risking damaging the aileron servos. It was originally intended to fill this 'gap' with a soft foam block but that was purely for aesthetics.

The fuselage was designed around the components that I wishes to use. Trying to save money, I opted for budget end for everything - I wasn't sure that this model was gong to last


Fuselage construction is the traditional simple box. The cut out to clear the ailerons if the wing got skewed looks quite odd but I have to admit I quite like it. It has Character.. :)


Any Ellison advised me to make the undercarriage strong. It will take a battering. I admit I underestimated strong but I decided to slot the main legs into the fuselage to transfer the impact into the main structure. Where I went wrong was that the front bracing legs were too thin and needed to be reinforced to the same level


Bare bones


You can see the wing mounted and the slot for the ailerons - to allow the wing to twist on impact and hopefully not rip the ailerons off.


ESC located above the battery in a screwed down hatch


Another shot of the undercarriage main mounting. The legs are screwed to a 3mm ply plate which is integrated into the former above. All locked together


The rear skid is stitched using Kevlar thread to a 3mm plate and epoxied into place.

It looked like this before its maiden.




Contrasting colours - probably not needed on this model..



With the model completed, I only managed to get 3 flights in before the InterClub Competion



The first flight ended prematurely  when the motor mount broke. Looks like it failed because I hadn't balanced the prop correctly. The replacement is cut from the next gauge up dural. That will not break..

My Inter Club comp flights were great fun but made me realise I had a lot to learn.

1. I had to fly a lot closer in than I normally do. I had problem keeping the model on track and judging the distance away from me. My 4th round Limbo flight ended after I 'took out' the far limbo pole which damaged the firewall but the rest of the model was unmarked... I can see this flying close and judging distance being a problem to me. Practice, practice, practice

2. Its very draggy - but adding more drag showed that I had insufficient power. In the water carry task, the take off was long and I could barely build up enough speed to perform the loop. I have subsequently fitted a larger prop which is within the power capacity of the power train.

3. The undercarriage wasn't strong enough. On the triple thrash (3 Touch and Go, 3 Rolls, 3 Loops) my second T&G removed the front u/c mounting. Easily fixed but it failed far too easily. This has now been replaced with a 12g leg and this is now bolted to the Firewall

After the comp, I replaced the Firewall with 6mm ply (was 3mm ply) and added Carbon Fibre reinforcement.


I have had a few more flights including some targeted hard touch and go's and it hasn't failed yet.

My thoughts on the model is that its a bit on the heavy side now - Although not dreadfully heavy, it could do with being 0.5kg lighter. Something to think about for the next version. Its great fun and dead easy to fly though

Roll on the next comp. That was really enjoyable.